Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yardstick
Nope, he's a liberal. I have had a fairly simple test for years to determine who I will and won't for.

The potential candidate that can get my vote will be for/have:

Pro-second amendment
For privatized medicine
Pro-life only
For smaller government
For legal immigration only

Romney doesn't meet any of those simple, conservative tests, so he is a liberal, regardless of how liberal republicans want to compromise.

He couldn't get the vote of conservatives because he wasn't conservative.

Lots of delusion going on that he was somehow conservative, and he wasn't.

I and many others won't vote for a liberal republican. No matter how much people tell us 'the other guy is worse'

A liberal is a liberal is a liberal. You can tell by what they do, not what they say.

That's the reason he's only won election one time since he started his political career.

He's a liberal.

Liberal republicans are un-electable.

/johnny

45 posted on 03/29/2015 5:58:43 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: JRandomFreeper

Yeah, I get it. Romney isn’t as conservative as we would have liked. The bottom line is that Romney would have been far better for the country than Obama. There was nothing forcing conservatives to sit back and let Obama happen.


47 posted on 03/29/2015 6:30:23 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson