Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NBA, Pacers issue statement in response to Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act law
Pro Basketball Talk ^ | Mar 28, 2015, 6:30 PM EDT | Brett Pollakoff

Posted on 03/28/2015 8:38:50 PM PDT by Liberty1st

The NBA and the Indiana Pacers released a joint statement on Saturday in regard to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act that was recently signed into law in Indiana.

The official release:

(Excerpt) Read more at probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; indiana; indianapolispacers; mikepence; nba; rfra
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: Vermont Lt

Clinton and the Dems did it on a federal level in ‘93....


21 posted on 03/28/2015 9:01:24 PM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1st

Courts have ruled limited ability to enforce so states have been adding their own laws for some time. Indiana is doing it now specifically for that reason. To protect business owners from these radicals out to destroy Christian business owners.


22 posted on 03/28/2015 9:02:39 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1st
I will never pay so much as a penny to see these morons play or buy even one cent worth of their childish merchandise.

The NBA is dead to me. To hell with them all... players, coaches, owners.

23 posted on 03/28/2015 9:02:51 PM PDT by caddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1st

I’d be willing to bet that if the State of Indiana threw the Pacers out of the state, they’d see a huge drop in the crime rate. They should give it a try.


24 posted on 03/28/2015 9:03:04 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ("I want to be America's first, historical, male first lady." - Slick Willie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1st
I don't have a problem with this statement. Nowhere in their statement do they condemn the law itself. They simply state what their position, in general, is.

This is what the new law was intended to do, protect the individual conscience. If you want to facilitate sinful behavior in your business, go ahead. If your conscience forbids it, you shouldn't have to.

25 posted on 03/28/2015 9:03:29 PM PDT by fidelis (Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

Please try to explain that to the angry, pro-sodomite commenters down at the bottom of the page if you would.


26 posted on 03/28/2015 9:03:41 PM PDT by Liberty1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Shadowstrike
And I give a Rats Butt about what the NBA thinks because?

Well, Indiana might care because the gays and other industrial strength victims have proven that they can get the leagues and conferences and conventions to shut down operations and events in states and cities that ever cross them in any way.

That may be a reason, even though it's unreasonable.

27 posted on 03/28/2015 9:11:21 PM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Migraine

They were strong enough in AZ to have Gov. Jan Brewer to veto a similar bill, didn’t they? The NFL Cardinals threatened to leave, or so I thought.


28 posted on 03/28/2015 9:20:00 PM PDT by Liberty1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1st

Where IS the governor? Has he addressed this backlash? Did he not think there would be one?


29 posted on 03/28/2015 9:25:50 PM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1st

Yeah, I never knew my thoughts lined up with the Taliban before.


30 posted on 03/28/2015 9:28:58 PM PDT by Slyfox (I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep for ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sports organizations all all levels should stick to their particular sport and stay completely the hell away from politics.

No one gives a crap about how many LGBTs are participating in competetive sports. Observers just want to see how well the participants perform in their chosen sport.

Decades ago, people didn’t make a big deal about Natrilova and Billy Jean being gay in pro tennis because they were top performers. Same has been true in other sports for many years regarding gays.


31 posted on 03/28/2015 9:31:17 PM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

There is no doubt in my mind that he needs to publicly stand up & defend religious freedom & say that he has no regrets whatsoever in signing the RFRA bill....& rub the Progressive’s nose in it while doing so.


32 posted on 03/28/2015 9:34:47 PM PDT by Liberty1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1st

Looks like the Pats aren’t the only sports franchise with deflated balls.


33 posted on 03/28/2015 9:34:52 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Are the Libertarians split on the RFRA & Gov. Pence signing it into law?


34 posted on 03/28/2015 9:36:32 PM PDT by Liberty1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1st
Oh no, I just can't go on with my life with the prospect of a Professional "Thugball" organization leveling threats at a State that decides to "enumerate" the rights already provided to our citizens via the First Amendment! /s

Please, let them relocate or disband! PLEASE!

35 posted on 03/28/2015 9:45:41 PM PDT by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1st

the homonazis have said their “rights” trump the First amendment.

Next the homonazis will demand churches to marry them and have the govt shutdown the churches which won’t.


36 posted on 03/28/2015 9:57:08 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1st
Why a State Governor would have to do it again 22 yrs later I don’t understand.

I never thought 22 years ago that whole states would jump ship on the sanctity of traditional marriage.

We have entered those days Our Lord talked about when He said people would call good evil and evil good.

37 posted on 03/28/2015 10:31:56 PM PDT by Slyfox (I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep for ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

If Clinton signed an RFRA 22 years ago (which he did), why is a State Governor doing it again now? I thought that once the Feds did something, the States wouldn’t have to sign another similar bill into law.

Like I asked earlier, did the Dems repeal the Federal RFRA when they took control of Congress, either during the Bush or Obama Presidencies?


38 posted on 03/28/2015 10:37:29 PM PDT by Liberty1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1st

in 1998, the supreme court ruled that the federal rfra does not apply to state / local laws. since then, 19 states passed their own rfra. one other thing, the hobby lobby case was decided on the rfra.


39 posted on 03/29/2015 1:38:11 AM PDT by yongin (I'd rather be a part of the prophetic minority than the mushy majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

“Where IS the governor? Has he addressed this backlash? Did he not think there would be one?”

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/pence-effort-clarify-religious-objections-law-underway


40 posted on 03/29/2015 1:52:51 AM PDT by snarkybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson