To: DoodleDawg
If the Supreme Court strikes down the subsidies as unconstitutional then how can Congress pass a law extending those unconstitutional subsidies for another 18 months?
I don't think the King decision will turn on constitutional grounds. Looks like statutory interpretation to me.
47 posted on
03/27/2015 7:09:29 PM PDT by
semimojo
To: semimojo
I guess we’ll find out if words mean what they say.
It was phrased that way on purpose to be used as a club to the states to get them to participate.
I expect Roberts to save it once again. This one will be easy after the contortions he went through last time.
50 posted on
03/27/2015 7:21:53 PM PDT by
Lurkinanloomin
(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
To: semimojo
“I don’t think the King decision will turn on constitutional grounds. Looks like statutory interpretation to me.”
oh, so congress just needs to pass a law with the correct average then (including ‘state OR federal exchange’)
68 posted on
03/28/2015 9:16:44 AM PDT by
Hardens Hollow
(Couldn't find Galt's Gulch, so created our own Harden's Hollow to quit paying the fascist beast.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson