Actually, no, we don’t have the same evidence. You see, I have read every accident and incident report associated with the A320. The carrier I flew for before I retired offered type rate me in the A320. I declined based on the accident data. (and I’m not the only one)
And you have yet to demonstrate a single shred of evidence that those accident and incident reports are in any way relevant to this crash. Until you can do that, we all have exactly the same knowledge as it regards this crash.
The carrier I flew for before I retired offered type rate me in the A320. I declined based on the accident data.
Ahh! Finally, we get to the reason you keep insisting that reading those accident reports gave you some sort of special understanding of this crash that none of the rest of us have. After reading those reports, you made a life altering decision and if this crash were due to mechanical failure, it would validate your reasoning behind it.
You are completely vested in an outcome of mechanical failure and will continue to insist that's what happened despite a dearth of evidence pointing in that direction and a growing body of evidence proving your assumption wrong.