Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RC one

“it’s only an insult if it’s not true.”

Bait and switch...I said name calling....which is the sign of a weak argument and weaker mind.

“nuts who think it is reasonable to walk around in grocery stores with assault rifles are a threat to my second amendment rights.”

SPORTING RIFLES....you are using emotive ANTI GUN retoric.

Another sign of a weak argument.

And your comment makes no logical sense.....open carry is legal.....period.

“Krogers is abiding by the law. When the law changes because a bunch of nuts and lefty fifth columnist types have turned public support against us, they will abide by that law too.”

Hand wringing and fear mongering.

Krogers is abiding by the law.....period.

“so it’s reasonable to carry a semi-automatic rifle with ahigh capacity magazine around in krogers? Is that it?”

It is LEGAL.....period.

“More to the point, how exactly does this advance the second amendment agenda?”

The “keep and bear” part.

” By getting in people’s faces and intimidating? Is that somehow helpful?”

Menacing is a crime...if you see someone doing it...by all means report them.

otherwise...your statement is hystronic.


59 posted on 03/25/2015 8:21:00 PM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Crim
Bait and switch...I said name calling....which is the sign of a weak argument and weaker mind.

If you feel the need to walk around your local grocery store with an assualt rifle, you're nucking futs. I walk around Krogers with a full sized Glock tucked under my shirt every time I go there. There's no reason to sisplay it. it serves no useful purpose. Quite the opposite, it alarms people-people who vote.

SPORTING RIFLES....you are using emotive ANTI GUN retoric.

Irrelevant and pointless.

And your comment makes no logical sense.....open carry is legal.....period.

Until people get sick and tired of seeing nucking futs walking around in grocery stores with assault rifles.

Hand wringing and fear mongering.

reality, something you need to get in touch with.

It is LEGAL.....period.

No. Is it reasonable? is it necessary? is it any kind of useful? No. No. and No.

The “keep and bear” part.

The supreme court has ruled that a state can place reasonable restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms. that would include openly carrying firearms which is what will happen when enough people have become sufficiently tired of yahoos running around their grocery storesd with ASSAULT RIFLES.

Menacing is a crime...if you see someone doing it...by all means report them. otherwise...your statement is hystronic.

It is unuseful, unproductive, passive aggressive BS from which nothing good will come. period. It does not strengthen the second amendment, it undermines it. You do not represent the majority of second amendment supporters or concealed carry advocates. You represent a fringe group of nut jobs. that is afact that you need to come to terms with.

60 posted on 03/26/2015 12:21:31 AM PDT by RC one (Militarized law enforcement is just a politically correct way of saying martial law enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson