Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

It is the taxpayers’ business to worry about the school milking the system for homeless funds when the **boy** is obviously NOT homeless at all.


14 posted on 03/26/2015 5:09:36 AM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: wintertime

Unless this dunce is self supporting, has way more money than sense, and if that is the case why would he still subject himself to school, he is being supported by someone and that someone has control. The state should not even enter the equation other than to find out who is supporting the underage idiot. I’m sure he is just overjoyed the girl friends family is willing to take him in, thus thumbing his nose at rules at home, while ostensibly enjoying all the benefits of cohabitation.


16 posted on 03/26/2015 5:19:15 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: wintertime

“It is the taxpayers’ business to worry about the school milking the system for homeless funds when the **boy** is obviously NOT homeless at all.”

Then go prove it. So far, all I’ve seen is a one-sided article written by someone with an obvious agenda to drum up sympathy for the parents.


18 posted on 03/26/2015 6:29:01 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson