To: E. Pluribus Unum
I’m of the belief that public servants (elected or appointed) should be giving the citizens full access to their video and audio, not the other way around. It is just as (if not more)important that we know what they are up to than vice versa.
4 posted on
03/25/2015 9:08:09 AM PDT by
apoliticalone
(The face of America is changing and only corrupt beholden politicians voted for it, not Americans)
To: apoliticalone
To: apoliticalone
I’m of the belief that public servants (elected or appointed) should be giving the citizens full access to their video and audio, not the other way around. It is just as (if not more)important that we know what they are up to than vice versa.Ditto!
6 posted on
03/25/2015 9:10:54 AM PDT by
ConservingFreedom
(A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: apoliticalone
Agreed. Who pays the piper calls the tune. Police video and audio are paid for lock stock and barrel by tax dollars. We pay for it all and have proprietary rights to the content. Videos taken with privately owned equipment? Better bring a f@#$ing warrant.
17 posted on
03/25/2015 10:10:25 AM PDT by
katana
(Just my opinions)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson