Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaNew
Well, that's where I disagree with Cruz then. Where do we come off saying that just because something is called a "law" it is valid? We have supreme law of the land, the Constitution. Adhering to the Constitution is what we need.

Please point to where Ted Cruz stated the law was "valid"?

Quit with the Red Herrings already!

He is auditioning to be the President of the United States, the Chief Executive. Do you really think he would be a fit leader if he chose NOT to do things constitutionally and legally? Both following the law, AS IS, and also trying to change the law, using the constitutionally defined process?

This is what he is, the POTUS candidate that is most knowledgeable about the Constitution and the one who has and will follow the constitution with the most fidelity.
67 posted on 03/24/2015 4:31:27 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie

Maybe in his position, he would have to try to get it repealed if he became POTUS. Don’t know how he would do that because he would be the executor, not the lawmaker.

Maybe that’s what he needs to do in his position. But the states have another route to take - reject and nullify Obamacare and other unconstitutional federal acts.


87 posted on 03/24/2015 4:55:29 PM PDT by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson