Posted on 03/23/2015 12:25:14 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Citizens can't (or don't) own antitank weapons, but with proper planning and resources can set fire traps and cook the contents.
Frickin madness.
I would be all in on writing this plan. “Hazard mitigation” implies, well, mitigating or reducing the impact of, in this case, climate change. What is to argue about that? Is it getting warmer? Colder? Dryer? Wetter? Windy-er? Pick one and reap federale dollars to cope with it.
That the climate is changing is not refutable. I would write a plan that would make FEMA’s head spin. Conservatives problem is that we would refuse to play the game. But games can be fun if played properly.
It does not say write a plan to prevent climate change.
You’re doing a heck of a job, “Brownie”.
????
Unbelievable!
That’s what W said to his FEMA director during Katrina.
Let’s blow up the logic of “settled science”.
If the models where correct there would be only:
1. One model
2. It would be 100% accurate.
Reality:
1. There are many climate models.
2. Not one of then is even close to being correct.
Conclusion:
It’s not about science except to have the word “science” used as a cover page for a political maneuver.
Sounds like an excellent opportunity to finally take Globull Warming to court.
Congress holds the purse-strings, defund FEMA and put a legitimate agency in and deny help to all states that have kooks running it that believe in the Global Warming Scam!
Note to the Socialist Loonies:
“Turnabout is fair-play”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.