Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ancesthntr

There have been many court rulings finding that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii and therefore he is a natural born citizen. Time and the courts will tell whether Ted Cruz’s birth in Canada changes the dynamic for him.

In 2008 Hawaii had a Republican Governor, Linda Lingle. Here is what she said regarding Obama’s place of birth:
“You know, during the campaign of 2008, I was actually in the mainland campaigning for Sen. McCain. This issue kept coming up so much in the campaign, and again I think it’s one of those issues that is simply a distraction from the more critical issues that are facing the country. And so I had my health director, who is a physician by background, go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records of the Department of Health, and we issued a news release at that time saying that the president was, in fact, born at Kapi’olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii. And that’s just a fact. And yet people continue to call up and e-mail and want to make it an issue. And I think it’s, again, a horrible distraction for the country by those people who continue this. It’s been established. He was born here.”—Governor Linda Lingle of Hawaii

A few examples:
Tisdale v. Obama, U.S. District Court Judge John A. Gibney, Jr.: “It is well settled that those born within the United States are natural born citizens.”— U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia, January 23, 2012.

Voeltz v. Obama, Judge John C. Cooper, Leon County, Florida Circuit Court Judge: “In addition, to the extent that the complaint alleges that President Obama is not a “natural born citizen” even though born in the United States, the Court is in agreement with other courts that have considered this issue, namely, that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”—September 6, 2012

Ankeny v. Daniels, Indiana Court of Appeals: “Based on the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the United States are ‘natural born citizens’ for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”—November 12, 2009

Swensson, Powell, Farrar and Welden v Obama, Administrative Law Judge Michael Mahili, State of Georgia Administrative Hearings: “For the purposes of this analysis, the Court considered that Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Ankeny, he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen. Accordingly, President Barack Obama is eligible as a candidate for the presidential primary under O.C.G.A. under Section 21-2-5(b). February 3, 2012

Allen v Obama, Arizona Superior Court Judge Richard E. Gordon: “Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise.”—Pima County Superior Court, Tuscon, Arizona, March 7, 2012


131 posted on 03/23/2015 10:49:28 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: Nero Germanicus

http://www.wnd.com/2010/06/165041/


136 posted on 03/23/2015 11:18:00 AM PDT by chicken head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: Nero Germanicus
There have been many court rulings finding that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii and therefore he is a natural born citizen.

We don't care. We aren't interested in the gas emissions from the courts. We are interested in what is objectively TRUE.

195 posted on 03/23/2015 1:44:44 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: Nero Germanicus
Oh, and once again you are putting fort "Argumentum ad vericundiam" (Arguing from Authority) and "Argumentum ad Populum". (Arguing from Popularity.)

Both are fallacies.

196 posted on 03/23/2015 1:47:11 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson