Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Changing the clocks is a minor pain twice a year.

Why not just stay on daylight time year round?

Or move clocks a half hour as a one time adjustment to split the difference, and then leave them there permanently?

I would be interested in any studies about energy use. The reason we now are on daylight time for almost 8 months of the year is because it is supposed to save energy. Anyone know if that’s really true?


26 posted on 03/23/2015 7:56:12 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego
Why not just stay on daylight time year round? Or move clocks a half hour as a one time adjustment to split the difference, and then leave them there permanently?

I'm not fond of the 1/2 hour shift, but states on the edges of the boundaries might want to consider switching to a different time zone before fixing the clocks once and for all, based on the better hour for year-round purposes.

28 posted on 03/23/2015 7:59:44 AM PDT by kevkrom (I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson