Posted on 03/21/2015 9:30:48 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Sharia courts have repeatedly announced their intentions to replace our laws. Until and if a solid majority of American Muslims disassociate themselves from that started goal, we should continue to view them with suspicion as the State of Texas is doing here.
BO has placed radical Muslims in authority over many aspects of our legal system and culture. Just see Valarie Jarrett, his puppet master. Until such time as this ends, there is ample grounds for suspicion by the public at large and, thus, accordingly, ample grounds for treating Sharia Courts differently from other church courts.
The Constitution is based on Christian principles, but every agreement reached by two parties does not have to be based on Christian principles.
Oliviaforever wrote:
“The Constitution is based on Christian principles,but every agreement reached by two parties does not have to be based on Christian principles.”
Is the agreement reached by two parties subject to further legal, constitutional review?
“Is the agreement reached by two parties subject to further legal, constitutional review?”
No, if you like you can trade a your car to someone for a fist full of ferry dust and there is no mandated constitutional review.
This is just the beginning I suspect.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.