Skip to comments.
Al-Aqsa Mosque Tells Pakistan: Nuke The West
Truth Revolt ^
| March 16,, 2015
| Jeff Dunetz |
Posted on 03/17/2015 6:46:08 PM PDT by QT3.14
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
03/17/2015 6:46:08 PM PDT
by
QT3.14
To: QT3.14
From what I’ve been informed of regarding Pakistan’s nuclear weapons, we (the US) control their security. At least that was about ten years ago.
2
posted on
03/17/2015 6:49:05 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
To: QT3.14
If Pakistan attacks the west with nuclear weapons, then the Muslim population of the world will be decreased by two-hundred million.
3
posted on
03/17/2015 6:51:14 PM PDT
by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
To: blackdog
If they aren’t on US soil saying we control them is farcical. US Navy warships excepted.
4
posted on
03/17/2015 6:51:16 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: Lurker
At one point we had a physical presence in Pakistan which guarded their nukes. Say as you may.
5
posted on
03/17/2015 6:55:15 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
To: QT3.14
Obama wouldn’t retaliate with nukes but Bibi would.
6
posted on
03/17/2015 6:55:23 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
To: QT3.14
The current paki leadership is not insanely hateful like these sheiks. Nor are they suicidal. However there is always the risk that more unpredictable forces will take power. If I were CiC I would have a permanent boomer station off the coast of pakistan, and all paki nukes pre-targeted.
7
posted on
03/17/2015 6:56:24 PM PDT
by
matt1234
(2015-2016 America's enemies sense obama's weakness and strike)
To: Lurker
8
posted on
03/17/2015 6:56:59 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
To: blackdog
“At one point we had a physical presence in Pakistan which guarded their nukes. Say as you may.”
Unless that physical presence is greater than a Division it’s less than a popcorn fart.
L
9
posted on
03/17/2015 6:58:53 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: QT3.14
Oh Great, somebody else wants to be first when Obama Surrenders.
10
posted on
03/17/2015 6:59:32 PM PDT
by
eyeamok
To: QT3.14
The muslim nuke.
Obama wants a world with zero nuclear weapons. However,instead of disabling the bad guys’s weapons programs he seeks to bring our arsenal and development programs to ZERO.
11
posted on
03/17/2015 7:01:00 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
To: reg45
Speaking of nukes, some cancers need to be treated with radiation. Islam is one of them.
12
posted on
03/17/2015 7:01:29 PM PDT
by
QT3.14
(GRUBER - HARK 2016 /s)
To: QT3.14
Not a matter of when, but which city is hit first?
13
posted on
03/17/2015 7:02:20 PM PDT
by
deadrock
(I is someone else.)
To: QT3.14
The Pakis have about 120 warheads. Their longest range missile can go about 1700 miles. Excellent for hitting targets in India. Not very effective for attacking USA.
To: Lurker
Code gremlins too. We did it to the entire ship load of missiles the NORKS sold to Syria. Our special forces did a little code rewriting and downloaded it. They all blow up real good about 15 seconds after launch.
15
posted on
03/17/2015 7:02:53 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
To: QT3.14
What’s their delivery system, besides boats?
16
posted on
03/17/2015 7:04:20 PM PDT
by
MaxMax
(Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
To: reg45; blackdog
The nukes in Paki are locked up tighter than a bulls ass in fly time.
First things the Pakis learnt about having nukes was that having nukes was worse than not having nukes.
17
posted on
03/17/2015 7:04:42 PM PDT
by
onona
(Obama's entire term reads like a John Semmens post.)
To: QT3.14
18
posted on
03/17/2015 7:04:50 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise. .)
To: blackdog
That’s great if they put them on a missile. What if they put them in shipping containers or commercial aircraft?
19
posted on
03/17/2015 7:05:24 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: Lurker
"Unless that physical presence is greater than a Division its less than a popcorn fart."
Which is exactly why cyber warfare is so much more effective with high technology weapons defense.
Of course as for low tech rag heads with Toyota's and RPG's lopping people's heads off for reading Sports Illustrated? That's another matter all together.
20
posted on
03/17/2015 7:08:06 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson