[paltz]

This article seems a little too hysterical and, frankly, misinformed about what different people do in a political comms shop. The staffer does social media outreach. She doesn’t decide Walker’s platform. When a comms person is hired, they are hired to represent the views of the candidate not the other way around. Furthermore, the staffer in question worked with Walker previously on his re-election campaigns via social media, so there was already a working relationship.

[JohnBrowdie]

stop trying to be reasonable, or even rational. It’s totally out of place here. it’s primary season. losing our minds is what we do.

[dragnet2]

She doesn’t decide Walker’s platform.

Since spokespersons do not decide policy, if Walker becomes President would you support him hiring a Muslim Spokesperson, who had very questionable ties and or views regarding terrorism?

[dragnet2]

Furthermore, the staffer in question worked with Walker previously on his re-election campaigns

That too begs the question:

Why would a conservative Republican associate with and conduct business with, and put into such a prominent position, an individual who is obviously pro-amnesty?

??

[central_va]

< rinospeak >This article seems a little too hysterical and, frankly, misinformed about what different people do in a political comms shop. The staffer does social media outreach. She doesn’t decide Walker’s platform. When a comms person is hired, they are hired to represent the views of the candidate not the other way around. Furthermore, the staffer in question worked with Walker previously on his re-election campaigns via social media, so there was already a working relationship. < /rinospeak >

You forgot your RINO speak tags