Posted on 03/12/2015 7:42:35 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey
Clinton insists that the 30,000 emails she has deleted purportedly about half of the correspondence stored on her server was personal in nature. Who made that determination, and what criteria were used? Even if her claims are taken at face value, it seems unlikely Clinton herself reviewed the messages one at a time. Who assisted her in this task, and what security clearance did they possess?
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Even the corp guys at ToyRUS are required to use biz email accounts for biz.
She should cancel her bus/plane rentals for any future campaigns she might be considering IMO.
I didn’t see haunted or panicked. I saw pissed. Pissed that someone had the audacity to even ask her about what she had done.
Why, pray tell, would she bother to delete 30,000 personal emails?
the oissed was the expression of the fear and the panic...
she couldnt act fearful or panicked.....that would be telling
good question Very Good Question.
shes bought the farm...but is too proud...far too PROUD to cop to being FINISHED
she will continue to Protest and fume..and ask what difference it makes.. of course
Probably been said, but that’s an inaccurate headline. Plenty of people read those emails, just not the people who should have gotten to review them.
Bring Mills to the Hill. Interrogate her mercilessly. Threaten her with prison. Bring Blumenthal up., Then, the Beast. Treat her with the same deference as she did the raped women of BJ. The republicans must get militant on this issue.
And who did the deleting? Federal employees on the govt’s dime? Private IT company?
And where are all the email she sent? People received them, and if they were fed workers, they should have archived them.
I don’t think he went to the Ford Center or whatever it’s called.
So she deleted all emails that weren’t saved to the state department servers (so otherwise retrievable, as she knew when she wrote them)—including all emails to/from her top aide, who also used her server, and to/from any foreign source.
Me too! Gonna be a rough road for her. Can’t wait for her congressional testimony. Seriously, a first grader knows more about technology than she does.
In the fantasy scenario of Holder prosecuting Hillary, we have Obummer pardoning her. Just sayin.............
I thought Huma was into kosher Weiners.
It doesn't matter. It wasn't the State Department's official vetter of public-private records so it was a felony to delete any of them.
She didn't have them deleted until after the State Dept. asked her to turn them over. That shows intent to hide documents.
They didn't ask her to hire someone to review them, that's not State Dept. protocol, they asked her to turn them over for their reviewer. All of them. That's the purpose of their review. More intent to defraud.
Get ready Hill, you ain’t Bill. Hopefully, the soon to be disbanded US Senate and House of Representatives can get a good legal overhanded, and deep underhanded shot at you- before their public dismissal by Emperor Obama. Fare thee not, you inhumane shame of Humanity
The server today resides in a data center in Seacaucus.
My hunch is, at some point she decided the box at her house in Chappaqua was too radioactive and needed to be decontaminated. So, she set about the task, but then realized she probably forgot something a competent computer forensicist might uncover. So, she rented a box at Internap, copied her sanitized email server to it, and changed mail.clintonemail.com to point to it.
As for the old box? Probably thermited the hard drive (that's what I would do). But a Clinton neighbor nevertheless sought to help out by advertising it:
She Who Must Not Be Named finds her wrinkled wattles stretched out on the chopping block, but whoever swings the axe had better not miss.
No one read them because it was assumed they were all incriminating.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.