Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkaX5n3pfZE

like the man says...’forget the implications, just look at the science...’


99 posted on 03/13/2015 6:37:09 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks

With careful listening to Steven Jones it is apaprent that he is mistaken in his analysis. He states early on that Newton’s law requires an equal and opposite force to be pulverizing the upper floors of the towers as they fall. But he then tells us that nano-thermite cut the columns such that near free-fall speed is achieved in the collapses. You can’t have it both ways. If there is a cutting of the supports by his ‘nano-thermite’ then there is no eqaul and opposite force to ‘pulverize’ the upper floors as they fall. And the video evidence shows these floors did not reach the ground as a rigid body, they were dustified in mid-fall. The word ‘pulverize was chosen by Jones because it aligns with his specious explanation. In reality, the buildings were turned to dust in mid fall and this cvannot be accomplish so quickly (or even at all) by a pancaking of the floors.


104 posted on 03/14/2015 9:56:59 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson