It’s worth it!! When can we start?
Let the 'Rats fix Mexico so we all want to move there....
Take Away All The Free Stuff and most will go home
Using that same argument, we should stop arresting burglars, rapists, drunk drivers, etc. because we can’t catch them all.
Most of that article is BS. It would not take 20 years to deport the majority of illegals. As soon as the govt announced they were rounding them up half would head for the border on their own. Nobody says we have to do this anyway.
Cutting off the goodies/freebies will send most of them home on their own anyway. If they can’t a job a drivers license or any kind of welfare they will go home.
Yes.
But it's not necessary.
Cut off SNAP, TANF, WIC, free medical care, in-state tuition, driver licenses, etc. to illegal aliens, and many will deport themselves. Many more won't bother coming in the first place.
I know they won't all self deport. Encouraging them to do so reduces the size, complexity, and COST of deporting the obdurate. It also reduces the size, complexity, and COST of all the welfare programs that are attracting many illegals in the first place.
20 billion a year to deport? In the scheme of things it is a drop in the bucket. I say do it.
Its worth it!! When can we start?
-—==0==-—
Deport or inter.....which ever is more cost efficient
Of course it is worth it. And it can be done without great expense. For one, cut off all social services and welfare and many illegal aliens will leave.
How much savings from entitlements would accrue?
How many fewer welfare, and related, workers would be needed?
How much would be saved by the health sector?
How much would the schools not need to spend?
How many unemployed Americans would be hired to replace the lost illegal workers?
How much stress would be removed from electrical, water, sewerage, and trash infrastructure?
How much fuel needs—all fuels—would be eliminated if they weren’t here to use it?
How much would be saved by law enforcement, including the courts & jails?
How would all those factor in against the cost?
How much is reduced crime worth?
Would it have been cheaper to not fight WWII, and just let Japan have the west coast; and why was that not a factor in whether or not to fight? How is this invasion different, that cost is become the primary factor?