You accuse other posters of “Insulting, condescending, dead-end arrogance.” and then you make a sweeping insult about “RomneyBots”.
Which is it? It sounds like you are demanding that people assume that you are acting in good-will and hold genuine conservative values. But then you think it’s just peachy for you to default to nasty name-calling if other conservatives think a different voting strategy is more productive?
Why don’t you think on it for a while and pick one... eiher nasty name-calling and assuming the worst of each other is acceptable, or treating others with respect as you demand the same.
THAT is a fact. Go read it.
THAT is name calling and insulting. It is dead-end, it is stupid, and it is arrogant.
It is also exactly like Romney supporters in 2008 and in 2012, who thought that the only reason people would reject Romney was because they "hated" him and/or were jealous of him.
In so doing, they leveled sweeping insults at people who rejected their candidate for much better and righteous reasons than stupid "jealousy and hate." GET REAL AND GET HONEST, TAMZEE.
The behavior of a candidate's supporters speaks volumes about the candidate. I don't know much about Walker, I think he's done a lot of good things and many folks I respect hold him in high regard, so that's in his favor.
HOWEVER, when someone assumes that the only reason thoughtful fellow conservatives have reservations about Walker is because they are "blinded by jealousy and hate," it is a RED FLAG as to Walker's true propensities.
It is an insult for ANYONE to write off an opinion as motivated in "jealousy and hate." You think it is insulting of me to make that clear observation. That is YOUR mistake.