Yes. When a grown up makes drastic changes in their core beliefs it does not make them immediately more qualified for the top job. It makes them less trustworthy in real life. I know the Church of Walker members think all criticism of HIM should be banned or something. That kind of attitude is as big a red flag as this one flip-flop.
How is that NOT a defensible position?
Nice straw-man argument. One, I am not a member of the "Church of Walker" - as I have said before, I prefer Cruz.
And no one is claiming that Walker should be immune to criticism for his positions. As I have pointed out myself, this position on ethanol bothers me.
What I am opposed to, for Walker and every other candidate, is the tendency for people to take a disagreement on policy or positions and then use that to argue that the candidate is a RINO or dishonest or worse. We definitely have enough RINOs in the race, but if we accuse everyone with whom we disagree of being a RINO, the term loses all meaning. It then means anyone who is not my preferred candidate...