Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tennmountainman; vette6387; RitaOK; entropy12

Yes, you admitted that you do not know that Gowdy has the legal authority to seize personal property. But that didn’t stop you from attacking him anyway. Thank you for at least being honest about that.

Congressional investigators apparently have very limited means to “enforce” a subpoena (to which I, as a limited government conservative, would argue is a VERY good thing!). But, please excuse me for missing your point. What does “subpoena enforcement” have to do with supporting your attacks against Rep. Gowdy?


97 posted on 03/08/2015 6:58:32 PM PDT by Synthesist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Synthesist

If what you say is true, that congress has no means of enforcing this email
supeona, why did Gowdy do it?

Grandstanding. Nothing more.

I get it from many here.

It is not about finding the truth and holding those responsible for the deaths
of 4 Americans in Bengazi.
It is about using the deaths of 4 Americans as a campaign tool for 2016.

And I find that digusting. The GOP is not interested in finding the truth.
You should read this article.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/415046/benghazi-committees-belated-interest-hillarys-hidden-e-mails-andrew-c-mccarthy


98 posted on 03/08/2015 7:19:02 PM PDT by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson