To avoid shock to the markets. A couple or three years would be right IMO.
Walker’s remarks from another article:
“Walker said he viewed the RFS as an access issue. “So it’s something I’m willing to go forward on, continuing the Renewable Fuel Standard and pressing the EPA to make sure that there’s certainty in terms of levels set,” said Walker, adding that he would like to see market access issues addressed in the long term and voicing support for blender pumps. “Right now we don’t have a free and open market,” he said”
Suspect this would make sense to someone “in the biz” LOL!
Most reports say Cruz made a good impression even standing firm against Ethanol mandates. That’s doing pretty good!
Most reports say Cruz made a good impression even standing firm against Ethanol mandates. That’s doing pretty good!
My feeling about any government mandate is that if it is bad, you eliminate it. As soon as possible. It doesn’t ban people from doing what was once mandated, but it is no longer a mandate.
Do you think that if the minimum wage was killed that suddenly McDonalds would give everyone a $5 an hour pay cut? But if a mandate is REALLY bad, it means the activity WOULD cease immediately. That’s the thing. If the mandate is so bad that that would happen, then the mandate needs to be killed as soon as possible.
And it is not ethical to keep it just to prop up an industry. As was said, that makes it raw corporate welfare.