The author is wrong again here. How secure her personal private unauthorized email might or might not have been is not the question. The question is why would she be communicating in an unauthorized manner outside of protocol? Without records/archives, how would the American people know what is being said, or if this person is even incompetent or can not be trusted? Traitors, subversive elements and incompetence have existed at all levels down though history.
Her personal security or how she personally safeguarded her private email is not the question here.
It's why there are checks and balances, records and archives.
Without them no one can be held responsible for anything. This alone should bar her from ever conducting business on behalf of the American people.
You have nailed it! This email scandal will put new light on the Benghazi investigation. I hope it places obstruction charges on the Hildebeast.
Why? That's the question that no one is answering even though it's being asked. The responses we get are that she wants everyone to have access to the emails and has released 55,000 pages (whoop-de-doo- a running email could be 10 pages alone) and that Colin Powell and Condi Rice had private emails. Those responses are not answers to why she didn't use an official state department email for official business.
Unless she gives a good reason (I don't know that there is a good reason), speculation will run rampant about her purposes.