I’ll take a haberdasher’s opinion over an Ivy League nitwit any day. Divide and conquer has been an effective strategy throughout history.
So who do you want to win, Iran or ISIS?
I am soooo confused...
Concieve this— ISIS is the creation of the US “intel” OK?
As such, it is a font of arms support for the delusional comrades in certain sectors of that world (the ones controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood) to create another Libya (that went so well).
Net result ISIS will fail as intended, and Iran will kick our ass, as intended. The intent is weakened US power in the region.
So, your question is exactly one posed by JUST such an Ivy League gigolo moron chickenh#t frenchie fake jean kerri’. Because he BELIEVES he’s in control. A complete farce.
Want the US to win. Then blast ISIS our to existence. Maintain secular Assad in place (who btw tolerates jews and christians in his country rather openly), and tell the GD Saudi’s to go kill their madrassah sponsors, and leave us the hell alone— or we’ll take THEM out.
The fine hand of the trough eaters of suppliers of arms to the Sauds.... I mean what WOULD they do if they didn’t have those contracts. The Sauds are killing us and so are the Iranians— the answer is get rid of both— destroy ANY hopes or network of the Caliphate. And that includes Turkey our “ally” in NATO (not). Kerri’ is a moron. Obamaumao is the one who thinks he can be caliph (when he is really a stupid mulatto perversion).
The notion of a moderate Iran is the first problem. The notion that Saud is our pal is the second problem. The NWO crowd does not care about this as regards sovereignty of the US.