I don’t think anyone who is capable of executing a young child in cold blood is fit to live amongst civilised human beings, I don’t care how much you think it is justified.
I’m intrigued by your response.
Are you saying that even if a child is willing and capable of attacking and killing others, that the child is not a legitimate target for elimination?
Civilization provides the very luxury of not knowing how truly brutal mankind really is.
If civilization is removed for whatever reason, we will know firsthand.
You may need to consider just how warped young minds can become when the seeds of islam are planted in it.
Just look at the young man on trial for the Boston bombing.
In order for you to live in you sheltered, soft, protected haven called Civilization there are those that Need to take action that in it's very nature is uncivilized.
We dropped Nukes on Japan killing EVERYONE in the area to keep from spilling American blood on Japanese soil.
We firebombed cities in Germany to hault the War Machine. Killing thousands of "innocent" germans.
You better hope we NEVER have to fight like that again, because there are too many Americans that don't have the balls to realize what you have to do to survive when you fight savages, religious Zealots or Commies. Plan on your Bloodlines to live as slaves...
ISIS are not human beings , they are demons in human looking embodiment .
The key phrase there is "in cold blood".
During the Iraq war, I remember coming across an email from a US soldier who was guarding a convoy. She spotted a nine-year-old (age estimated, obviously) leveling a weapon at her people. She took him out. She's a hero. Deal with it.
On the other hand, the individuals who killed the nine-year-old in this article, are sand nazi war criminals who need to die!