[CivilWarBrewing]

Our Constitution ISN'T EVEN IN PLAY HERE.. This argument hinges on WHETHER THE WORDING IN OBAMACARE MEANT WHAT IT SAYS IT MEANT, OR WHAT OBAMA WANTED IT TO MEAN. He funded States NOT in the exchange, which was IN VIOLATION OF THE OBAMACARE LAW because the LAW CLEARLY SAYS that shall NOT be done!

This case before the Supremes has NOTHING TO DO with the Constitution.

[skeeter]

All shouting aside, the fact that four of the supreme court justices who will be ruling on this case clearly do not believe that the document that has provided the foundation for our legal system for the past 200 years means what it clearly says does speak to their mindset, don’t you think?

[i_robot73]

There hasn’t been a case before the Court in quite a many moon, where the Constitution was even acknowledged.

Foreign Law, foreign declarations and ‘legal president’ have been used by the tyrants.

If the Constitution was even a factor, it should have taken only 5 minutes before the gavel was down and 15 min. later the one paged ‘NO’ vote released.

Instead, we’ll have another 1000pages of what the meaning of the word IS is by our ‘lawyer-ly betters’

[hawkaw]

Thanks for the clarification.