[skeeter]

I guess I'm among that 30%. I will never agree to sending Americans in harms way under Barack Obama and Valerie Jarrett's command.

ESPECIALLY against Islamists.

[Night Hides Not]

Well stated. The only way I favor this is overwhelming force and rules of engagement that protect our service members lives.

[kidd]

I’m in with the 30% until the mission is better defined
- objective
- how is victory claimed
- what are the rules of engagement
- what is to be done with POWs
- how will it be paid for
- The US military MUST be in control of all of its units all the time (no UN leadership)

I am deeply uncomfortable with giving Obama the right to engage in war with an undefined objective and an administration that believes military combatants should be treated as criminals with the rights of US citizens.

[Calpublican]

yes, Obama is not to be trusted. Even if he agreed to such an attack with our allies and other interested parties, he would find a way to tie the hands of the combatants on our side. He is fiendishly clever.

[AZLiberty]

Agreed. As much as this evil needs to be crushed, Obama is not the one to do it. He would rather see the destruction of the army of the U.S than the army of Islam.