Without any investigation or thought you might believe your are doing the right thing, but you would primary one of the highest ranked conservatives in the house. He had a reason for voting Boner, best find out why, and then do what you think is right.
That was the only vote from Raul Labrador that I ever took issue with. He’s not mine, but you can count on him as a conservative, where others you cannot, so let’s throw the baby out with the bathwater, and listen to the agitators try to kill any votes for GOP candidates before the next election has even begun.
I believe such action is called poisoning the well, and agitators have a rich target environment right here at FreeRepublic. You win a stunning victory in the last election, and already folks are trying to undo that victory and upset the potential for the next by stirring the political pot based on one issue and the lack of brass ones in the House and Senate.
All of the RINO’s are still around and the recent election was not a coup. It took decades for the decline of the Congress, one hopes it won’t take decades to rid ourselves of the dead wood, but the fight goes on and you win by small margins in a nation pretty evenly divided on what direction we are supposed to be heading. Stop fighting for what is right and you get what you deserve.
And what is wrong with primarying Lab anyways? He's been a congress critter since 2011 and has passed the threshold of a traditional 4-year military enlistment. He's done his public service, and he should move on the to private sector and make society better by working hard, like all of us.
He's not royalty, he's a normal man, with faults. But when a politician votes a known enemy of conservatism into a leadership position, who basically granted 100 million illegal invaders the right to vote against conservative leaders in the future, then this politician deserves to be booted from political office. So I give my final judgment with a fat thumb down.