Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

The distinction being that Chamberlain, as wrong headed as he was, actually loved his country- unlike Obama and his jihad “negotiators”.


7 posted on 03/03/2015 8:59:08 AM PST by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TADSLOS

Chamberlain seemed to have gotten a lot of undeserved historical rancor. If he had said no, then Hitler would have invaded Czechoslovakia in 1938. WW2 would have started a year earlier. Big deal.


10 posted on 03/03/2015 9:01:44 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: TADSLOS

Another distinction is that Chamberlain eventually realized his policy of appeasement was wrong, and led his coalition to finally confront Hitler. He may not have done it well, but that’s beside the point.

0bama, as you say, does not love his country, and therefore is incapable of seeing that what his doing is wrong. He’s perfectly happy to bring down the United States.

What he may not realize, is that he is fomenting a war, perhaps even a worse one than World War 2, by making America weak. The world he thinks he is saving he is instead leading into chaos of a violent variety.


17 posted on 03/03/2015 9:23:37 AM PST by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson