Posted on 02/28/2015 6:25:51 PM PST by PROCON
On Friday, C.J. Pearson, a 12-year-old conservative from Georgia who posted a viral video supporting Rudy Giuliani, discovered that his personal Facebook page was locked. In an exclusive interview with Examiner.com on Saturday, Pearson said he received a message from someone about 6 a.m. Friday. That's when he learned his account and page had been locked for "suspicious activity."
He jumped through all of Facebook's hoops, but wasn't able to recover his account. So he created a new profile to take its place. His public page was not affected, he said, however, he can no longer administer the page. Fortunately, he said, a friend is helping post links to that page.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
No, you tried to compare apples and oranges.
Please, tell me all about how alike they are.
You can have a site talking about a hammer drill and another site talking about an air ratchet ... but they BOTH are going to have the same deletion protocols, which is, you violate policy - you get deleted ... :-) ...
No, what you said in post 6 was the same as saying the air wratchet and the hammer drill were alike.
Different subjects ... same deletion protocol ... you violate policy, you get deleted ... :-) ...
Exactly right. And they used it to squelch an independent Black voice that cannot be allowed to be heard. I am just saying: be smart, use Dad's account.
I don’t believe I was commenting on air ratchets and hammer drills ... I believe that’s your thing ... LOL ...
I was talking about deletion protocols, which are the same in that if you violate policy, you get deleted.
Dad won’t be happy when you get his account deleted ... LOL ...
It’s violation of policy to let anyone else use your account ... :-) ...
Lol.
The lawyer like word games you play vastly amuse me.
No, they are not in any way alike.
Facebook is a social media site, it is used mainly to post minor thoughts and random updates and connect people.
People and items are banned from there in a willy nilly nonsensical fashion based more off of “somebody got offended”.
FR is a political activist web forum.
You get banned from here for pushing liberal ideas or getting caught trolling, concern trolling, or being a combative impervious to discussion and information whelp like HMS Surprise did the other day.
No, you were comparing apples and oranges.
Or stated another way, air wratchets and hammer drills.
Different subjects ... same deletion protocol — you violate policy, you get deleted [and actually everyone already knows that ...]
Try it out on all different subjects “Apples or Oranges” — you violate policy, you get deleted [Apples, Oranges, hammers or wrenches ... :-) ... ]
What protocol is that on Facebook?
Things get banned willy nilly for no apparent reason.
Businesses have Facebook pages, and if someone decides to be offended, it is gone.
Explain how that is the same.
Again, you are trying to compare apples and oranges.
There is zero comparison between FR and Facebook.
None.
Compare Facebook with something similar like LinkedIn.
It’s the same deletion protocol on Facebook — you violate policy, you get deleted.
That’s why I tell people to not violate policy ... :-) ...
Apples, Oranges, Pears, Prunes ... and “you name it” — you violate policy, you get deleted.
Here, let me help you with a basic comparison between similar entities:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LinkedIn
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook
Keywords: “social networking”
Keep using an invalid example.
It works well in actual honest information flow.
Different subjects ... same deletion protocol ... you violate policy, you get deleted.
It’s because he’s black, obviously. Don’t bother denying it, Zuckerberg.
It happens across the board in every instance no matter what ... you violate policy, you get deleted — it’s that simple.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.