Thanks, Bob.
The complexity of this subject astounds me.
Every time I think I have a grasp on the basic arguments, someone introduces a brand new argument and half a dozen new scientific terms and charts I’ve never seen before.
yeah basically the latest from the climate change alarmists is the term ‘forcings’ (which is why I said to do keyword search for ‘forcing’ on that whatsupwiththat.com site article you posted- the comments below the article go into pretty good detail on the hypothesis- and the commenters there are pretty knowledgeable- a lot of it is beyond me- but I can usually grasp the basics- enough ot formulate an argument sometimes at least-
The graph that was given in that article showing the ‘forcings’ didn’t jive with temp recordings in the 80’s and 90’s apparently- and basically the article was stating that the readings were only taken in specific spots- and not very thoroughly enough to establish a probability
There were other problems brought up by the commenters there- but these were the key ones- others were correlation does not = causation- I’m too tired right now to think of the other main issues- but I’ll go over them tomorrow possibly and post the key points as I understand them