>> no fricking anchor babies.<<
So, no Walker unless he gets the Constitution amended first?
What, are you on the Supreme Court?
You’ve got it all figured out, do you?
Tell me, Justice, have you also decided, in your glory, that any random wanderer of the earth will granted U.S. citizenship just because she whelps a child here? And all her common-law husbands and brothers and sisters and her cousins and grandparents and in-laws and outlaws and neighbors too?
And have you also concluded, Your Honor (as Walker apparently has), that Obama’s amnesty directive is just fine too?
After all, it would just be considered an act of love, right?
When I wrote the words “anchor baby” I was actually primarily thinking of what you, I’m sure, refer to as “Dreamers” but frankly I am damned sick of this allowance and that allowance always counting as long as the transgressor is not an ordinary, working, law-abiding, tax-paying, lifelong resident of the U.S.
So yes. If Walker is for any of those things he has lost my vote. How about yours?