Post 14 was a simple enough post, there was nothing in there that implied that you need to explain that you aren’t an elected official and in the legislature, or about any powers you might have.
Your post was totally evasive in responding to the simple observation in post 14.
Here it is in it’s entirety. “Your early posts on the topic and your persistence in posting on it, indicate that polygamy is not something that you strongly oppose.
Am I correct in thinking that forbidding polygamy is not a major goal to you?”
Why should it be something I’m for or against forbidding? Polygamy, insofar as I know, is already illegal within the United States, or did you hear something while I was out today? And since “gay marriage” is now the law of the land, how will anyone stop polygamy or relative marriage? On what basis? Welcome to Obamaland.