Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland

Dude, they GAVE Tauschers seat up when she was running for the last time before she took that (I forget) appointment a while back. Republicans ran no one, and the Libertarian, who DREW FREAKIN’ 27% OF THE VOTE WITH NO ADVERTISING, was a closet progressive.

That was a FREE SEAT for the taking for a true libertarian or strict constructionist in the district that includes Contra Costa County.

24-36 house seats in particular would be a no brainer if they devoted their money to local stuff instead of tilting at the windmill of a national presidential race. Most of the places that have been or are in the process of legalizing weed are doing so via people who are socially “liberal” but not communists. I believe those places would cough up those seats handily.


350 posted on 02/27/2015 8:27:42 AM PST by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies ]


To: Axenolith

Dude, apparently you have been partaking of that newly legalized substance. A third party, which would be a conservative third party, would split the vote with the GOP establishment candidate and the RAT wins. 26-34 seats? A very nice thought but dreaming. The average cost of a Congressional seat is about 1.7 mil. Presuming the RAT will always get in the range of 40% out the gate, let’s do the math. How does any 3rd party candidate take away maybe 90% from the establishment GOP establishment candidate? That is Common Core math.


361 posted on 02/27/2015 10:59:18 AM PST by doug from upland (Obama and the leftists - destroying our country one day at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson