Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

“NATO does include the U.S. and 27 other nations.”

So what? How hard is it to understand that only one of those nations is a threat to Russia? Take away the U.S., and all the other nations in NATO combined are not enough to make the Russians flinch.

“Are you saying that you want a more Reagan/Cruz reaction to Putin’s invasion, or that you prefer Obama’s weakness and not taking a strong stand against Russia?”

I’m just making the common sense observation that as long as Obama is CIC, he won’t do anything to seriously oppose Russia. He’s a red diaper baby, for crying out loud. Without us leading the way, NATO won’t do anything either, because they know very well that they are no threat to Russia without us.

“Do you approve of the actions so far?”

Whose actions?


42 posted on 02/24/2015 2:46:35 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

First, that isn’t the case, Russia is not as strong as you think it is, and two, you cannot pretend that NATO doesn’t include it’s most powerful and founding member, the United States.

Why are you unwilling to say whether you want Obama to be stronger or weaker?

It seems pretty weird to be so angry without telling us what you are angry about (too weak, or too strong), and why are you so passionate if you aren’t even paying attention to the actions already taken and being taken?


43 posted on 02/24/2015 2:56:27 PM PST by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson