Well you were the one who assumed that she took her actions out of "love". That term is nowhere to be found in her letter to the parents of the kid. Just "Sorry I didn't tell you earlier that I refuse to see you" and "You're welcome in our office, just not to see me" and so on and so forth. And again I support her right to do so, as I support the right of the Oregon baker and the Washington florist to serve whatever clientele they choose. But I just can't grasp the concept of "I love you so much I refuse to have anything to do with you or your kid" that you seem to see in this whole affair.
So you can not allow her motivation as being loving since he reasons for transferring care was that "I would not be able to develop the personal patient-doctor relationship that I normally do with my patients. I felt that was not fair to the two of you or to Bay. I felt that you deserved that type of relationship and I knew you could could get that with Dr. Karam."
But I just can't grasp the concept of "I love you so much I refuse to have anything to do with you or your kid" that you seem to see in this whole affair.
She never refused to give any needed care, but deferred a "wellness" check and any further visits to another doctor at no delay or inconvenience to them. I am sorry that you cannot grasp the concept of this being what was loving when otherwise it would almost surely result in conflict and stress, such as them pressuring her to affirm their union and homosexual rearing, or of them objecting to Christian aspects of her care (praying for the child?), and which she felt she could not submit to, then thus indeed it would be better to have someone else handle it.
In addition, i think i recall that the doctor engaged in a kind of holistic care, and a pediatrician's care can continue up to 18 years of age. Meanwhile, the lesbian parents will (ab)normally raise that innocent child to be a homosexual, or inclined to be so. Don't you think conflict would develop, and that it was best to prevent attempting a working relationship with that family rather than have to break ir off later or endure a rocky one, with possible lawsuits?
Even if a liberal flag burning antiwar activist brought his truck, which driven in his protest parades, into a conservative patriot body shop worker and said "I want to you to customize my truck," I think that at least for the sake of the good truck he might want to let his liberal mechanic take care for it instead.
But in reality he should be able to refuse any such service.