It's not the child's fault.He/she has done nothing wrong.Yes,God is surely *very* displeased with the lives that the "parents" have chosen but wouldn't have been *at all* displeased with the child.Are there any other innocent children that you feel God would want to see denied medical care?
Just curious.
The picture here is more complex. The doctor asked another doctor in the same office to see the child instead.
Perhaps as Jack H. surmised, the woman was a doctor with an Old World manner who would have lovingly embraced normal parents but was so put off by this surprise situation that she felt she could not practice effectively. There are always questions of capability to be had.
We really need to be hating the devils that are calling the “gay lobby” to bully so.
You may have a background in academic medicine, but you do not seem to understand everyday medicine any better than a layman. I remember a few years ago when I was looking for a new doctor, it was VERY important to me to find one with whom I had common ground in basic worldview and medical ethics. That is really what this is about, it is NOT about denying service to a child or “punishing” a child; the child was treated on schedule by a presumably competent physician, one who was undoubtedly a better match for these parents than the Christian doctor would have been.
You sound just like the libs in your own state. Where did the doc leave the child without care? And which required a close relationship with the parents, thus leaving them with one who could, rather than abandoning the kid as you and the MSM infer? Why do you do this?