Most Christian businesses do not refuse to serve gays per se, but only draw the line concerning gay marriage. I do not think that most Christian doctors would consider it wrong to provide medical service to gays, much less to provide it to their children.
I wouldn’t mind treating the child but don’t want a goll-darn thing to do with the “parents”.
Why would a married doctor with young children at home want to take on patients who willingly deal in fecal play and immune system disorders and who are in denial about the real state of their health? Why would he or she want to take those disease exposures home to his or her own family? Why would the doctor want crossdressers and body mutilators in the waiting room with the natural mommies, infants and children?
If you have ever seen someone who is dying of AIDs and covered with opportunistic infections because of a destroyed immune system, you might understand why a doctor might refuse. You can tell people that anal sex rips and tears membranes that were not designed to be used that way, and you can tell people that oral sex and oral-anal contact is inherently risky, but it is another matter to deal with advanced stages of the diseases and ailments that come from a fetishistic application of sex toys and maladaptive sexual behaviors that are essentially voluntary.
Does a doctor have the option to stop treating an unregenerate alcohol or drug abuser who refuses rehab? Same thing.
The government shouldn’t have anything to say about with whom anyone does business. Anti-discrimination laws are tyrannical. Before people get worked up about the possibility of racial discrimination, if it happened today, the business owner would pay a price in lost sales.
We aren’t a free people if we do not have freedom of association.