[DiogenesLamp]

That could be said about a countless number of things, making it the perfect rationale for unlimited goverment control. I’ll pass.

Another effort to equate indulgent drug usage with necessary production. We must have food. We can live without weed.

It is axiomatic that those freedoms necessary for living are of a much greater consequence than mere indulgences.

[Magic Fingers]

“Another effort to equate indulgent drug usage with necessary production. We must have food. We can live without weed.”

And that’s another effort to justify government overreach when it suits your biases. We can live without donuts shops (bad for your health) and car washes (bad for the environment). Want to ban them? Somebody does, or will, you can count on it, and you can count on them wanting the government to be their enforcer. Your position that using marijuana does not help anyone under any circumstances has no connection to reality.