Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pelham
OK, fair enough.

It wasn't your statement, but what would be good enough? And is there any potential candidate that is close to that?

From the various links being thrown back and forth, it appears that all the top choices of conservative Freepers share roughly the same position. Some on here have made statements that anyone who supports amnesty in any form is unacceptable. That pretty eliminates everyone.

91 posted on 02/20/2015 6:35:28 PM PST by T. P. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: T. P. Pole

Cruz has been my favorite. But it depends on whether or not he’s said that he has no intention of deporting our current crop of foreign citizens illegally squatting in the country. If he has said that, as some have been saying, then my choice would be Jeff Sessions. But he’s not running.

I had a front row seat to watch California transform from American suburbia in the late 1960s into the third world colony it has become today. It became obvious that the GOP establishment was on the side of illegal aliens when they fought against grassroots Californians on Prop 187 in 1994. They have only gotten worse since.

So that’s how I decided that Republicans who won’t deport foreign nationals won’t get my vote. And you may be right, it may eliminate everyone.

If you can tell me how it makes sense to help ethnically cleanse America of its population and replace it with a foreign one then maybe I’ll vote for a Jeb Bush or a Marco Rubio and hasten the process. Why go over the cliff slowly when you can end things in style?


92 posted on 02/20/2015 7:47:40 PM PST by Pelham (The refusal to deport is defacto amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson