Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This is what Republican governance looks like: Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner’s frightening agenda
Salon ^ | February 18, 2015 | Luke Brinker

Posted on 02/19/2015 12:33:26 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

Amid depressed turnout and pent-up frustration with the Springfield status quo, Illinois voters last November ousted Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn, awarding billionaire venture capitalist Bruce Rauner a five-point victory. The five weeks since Rauner took office as Illinois’ first Republican governor in a dozen years have offered a vivid illustration of the truism that elections have consequences — consequences that will be paid disproportionately by the state’s poor, working class, and middle-income citizens.

Rauner fired the opening salvo in his war on workers earlier this month, issuing an executive order that allows public employees to opt out of paying fees to unions that collectively bargain on their behalf. Under current state law, nonmembers who benefit from union contracts — about 14 percent of unionized state employees — must pay “fair share” fees to help fund collective bargaining and contract negotiations; those fees are lower than the dues paid by full members. Despite a 1977 Supreme Court ruling upholding the constitutionality of fair share fees, Rauner argues that they’re unconstitutional, forcing workers to support political speech with which they disagree. The governor makes this assertion even though, in accordance with that same Court ruling, public unions don’t use fair share fees to fund political activities. Cognizant that he’s on shaky legal ground, Rauner has retained the white-shoe law firm Winston & Strawn to defend his executive order in court.

While the governor recognizes that the political dynamics don’t favor a statewide right-to-work law, he has expanded his fight against unions to include a proposal for “right-to-work zones,” in which workers would be allowed to opt out of paying union fees even if they benefitted from union-negotiated contracts. The inevitable consequence — and deliberate aim — would be a further erosion of unions’ bargaining power.

Another set of flaming volleys flew in the direction of the state’s working people on Wednesday, as Rauner delivered his first budget address before lawmakers in Springfield. Rauner called for an 11.5 percent cut in the state’s budget for the year beginning July 1, urging lawmakers to bring the budget down to $31.5 billion from its current level of $35.6 billion. Hardest hit would be health care for poor people, higher education, and mass transit.

The Chicago Tribune reports that the governor’s budget would slash Medicaid spending by $1.5 billion, cut higher education by $387 million, and reduce revenue-sharing with cities and towns by $600 million. Rauner also targets transportation, calling for an end to a state subsidy that helps fund reduced fares for the poor and disabled.

Moreover, Rauner would cut pensions for current state workers, moving them to the lower-benefit pension plan for recent hires, despite a state constitutional injunction against the diminishment of pension benefits. The governor’s budget would exempt police officers and firefighters from the change.

State Sen. Heather Steans, a Chicago Democrat, told the Tribune that she was particularly worried by the governor’s proposed cuts in mental health care not covered by Medicaid.

“Cutting mental health at this point in time just does not seem like it’s viable or certainly not an intelligent long-term savings plan,” she told the paper, citing fears that the cuts would lead more people to end up in jails and prisons. “You end up having more expensive costs in other higher-cost settings. I think that’s very sort of short-sighted.”

Even neoliberal Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel — a close personal friend of Rauner’s — raised significant concerns about the budget. Emanuel told a Tribune reporter that Rauner should emphasize “closing corporate tax loopholes” over spending cuts, and the mayor decried the idea that one can “balance the state’s budget on the backs of the children of the city of Chicago.”

For his part, Rauner insists war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, and his budget is a boon for “working families.”

“Illinois government is currently designed to benefit those inside the system rather than those working families throughout our state,” he told lawmakers. “We must institute major reforms, or whatever balanced budget we craft together this year will be undone to put the people’s interests first and the special interests last.”

In Rauner’s Illinois, the poor, the sick, students, and ordinary wage-earners constitute “the special interests.” Putting people first, meanwhile, requires gutting social services and ending hard-fought worker protections. This, in all its cruel Orwellianism, is what Republican governance looks like.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: government; illinois; jobs; righttowork; union
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Is the proper spelling of boo hoo, boo hoo? Or should it be boo-hoo or maybe boohoo?


21 posted on 02/19/2015 3:26:14 AM PST by InterceptPoint (Remember Mississippi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Hardest hit would be health care for poor people, higher education, and mass transit.


The truth is that you you could cut funding for Chicago Public Schools by 50% or more and likely have the same educational outcome. Why? Because the vast majority does not care about learning.


22 posted on 02/19/2015 3:52:07 AM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

The highlights in his hair and lipstick were dead giveaways as well.


23 posted on 02/19/2015 3:52:35 AM PST by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The Supreme Soviet is watching you, comrade.


24 posted on 02/19/2015 4:16:05 AM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

Yes!

: )

: (


25 posted on 02/19/2015 4:17:45 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Oh boy, the left surely does not like the governor. Letting workers opt out of union dues; what’s not to like?


26 posted on 02/19/2015 4:26:18 AM PST by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I was thinking of moving to Illinois and carrying water for Bruce’s revolution until.....

“The governor’s budget would exempt police officers and firefighters from the change. (needed pension reductions)”

Alas. Bruce has feet of clay....or at least clay on his feet. He plays to the praetorian chorus.

Why should they be exempted?

An answer to that question defines if one is fit to be free or is born with bent knee to lick boots of their betters.

While Bruce is no longer my “100% rock star” and BFF. I would still stand him to a beer and remind him that all men are created equal and that in this Republic, no title of nobility may be conferred or enjoyed.

Cops and firefighters are public servants no less than public works or transportation and should be treated no differently.


27 posted on 02/19/2015 4:36:16 AM PST by Lowell1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The governor makes this assertion even though, in accordance with that same Court ruling, public unions don’t use fair share fees to fund political activities.

Instead, a higher percentage of the union dues are used to fund political activites than collective bargaining activities, and the fair share fees that non-union memmbers pay are higher than they ought to be in order to subsidize the cost of collective bargaining for the union members. Indeed, this is the equivilent of Planned Parent's claim that it does not use federal funds to kill unborn children. Instead, PP uses federal funds to pay rent, electric, and other soft costs that are not directly tied to homicide, which frees up the funds that do not come from the Feds to pay for the killings.

28 posted on 02/19/2015 4:36:50 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 98ZJ USMC

The horror...


29 posted on 02/19/2015 4:51:47 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sargon

Just follow the money...

It took me years to learn that little trick, EVERYTHING the Politicians and especially the left leaning ones do is about money and how to control and accumulate as much of it as ‘they’ can.


30 posted on 02/19/2015 5:04:18 AM PST by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Salon...makes the (CPUSA paper) Daily Worker look moderate.


31 posted on 02/19/2015 6:15:29 AM PST by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

We live in Illinois ( ok, quit throwin stuff at me)
my wife was picking up an RX prescription @ Walgreens yesterday. Overhears\sees this:
Guy in front of her had his RX rejected because of some Medicaid rule where he exceeded something for the month.
He tells whoever, ok here’s my HMO card, you can use this.


32 posted on 02/19/2015 6:56:23 AM PST by stylin19a (obama = Eddie Mush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I give him kudos for taking the flak already....let’s hope he’s got some fortitude to get the job DONE.

Still, some are more equal:
“..would cut pensions for current state workers, moving them to the lower-benefit pension plan for recent hires, despite a state constitutional injunction against the diminishment of pension benefits. The governor’s budget would exempt police officers and firefighters from the change...”


33 posted on 02/19/2015 9:12:04 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

FIRE FOR EFFECT


34 posted on 02/19/2015 11:05:20 PM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson