Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude
There is demonstrable societal harm done by the actions of adults who consent to engage in immoral behavior.

"Societal harm" sounds collectivist to me - can you be less vague about the nature of this supposed harm?

Would you have prostitution de-criminalized?

It seems to be working well in Nevada.

All drugs?

The only demonstrable result of drug criminalization is to enrich criminals ... although that said, if we'd abandon the rank nonsense of banning pot we might find ourselves left with a war on drugs we can actually win.

Polygamy?

If you mean polygamous "marriage," as I said about homosexual "marriage" it's another thing entirely, since marriage is a positive act by an institution (government or house of worship).

Public nudity and obscenity?

No, I didn't consent to accept the light reflecting off from those acts.

44 posted on 02/18/2015 10:18:57 AM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: ConservingFreedom

Just as I thought. You are no different than a liberal. Your purported reasons are just different.


59 posted on 02/18/2015 11:22:53 AM PST by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson