To: PapaBear3625
“One main reason for the 2nd Amendment is to enable citizens to protect themselves, when their government declines to perform the function of protecting them.”
You suggest, then, that American citizens should go on the offensive, on their own, without government participation?
To: GodAndCountryFirst
Do the words “protect themselves” mean “go on the offensive”?
38 posted on
02/16/2015 2:13:40 PM PST by
GeronL
To: GodAndCountryFirst
You suggest, then, that American citizens should go on the offensive, on their own, without government participation?
Unless the "leadership" is replaced, I'm not seeing any other choice.
42 posted on
02/16/2015 2:47:33 PM PST by
Old Yeller
(Civil rights are for civilized people.)
To: GodAndCountryFirst
You suggest, then, that American citizens should go on the offensive, on their own, without government participation? No, I'm saying that they should be prepared to protect themselves, because Obama's people are unlikely to.
"...and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" -- Luke 22:36
If you don't have a gun, get one. Get your CCW. Train and practice. Get used to being armed. You will not know the day, nor the hour, when you may need to defend yourself or your family.
47 posted on
02/16/2015 4:50:17 PM PST by
PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson