Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625

“One main reason for the 2nd Amendment is to enable citizens to protect themselves, when their government declines to perform the function of protecting them.”

You suggest, then, that American citizens should go on the offensive, on their own, without government participation?


37 posted on 02/16/2015 2:12:37 PM PST by GodAndCountryFirst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: GodAndCountryFirst

Do the words “protect themselves” mean “go on the offensive”?


38 posted on 02/16/2015 2:13:40 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: GodAndCountryFirst
You suggest, then, that American citizens should go on the offensive, on their own, without government participation?

Unless the "leadership" is replaced, I'm not seeing any other choice.
42 posted on 02/16/2015 2:47:33 PM PST by Old Yeller (Civil rights are for civilized people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: GodAndCountryFirst
You suggest, then, that American citizens should go on the offensive, on their own, without government participation?

No, I'm saying that they should be prepared to protect themselves, because Obama's people are unlikely to.

"...and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" -- Luke 22:36

If you don't have a gun, get one. Get your CCW. Train and practice. Get used to being armed. You will not know the day, nor the hour, when you may need to defend yourself or your family.

47 posted on 02/16/2015 4:50:17 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson