Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

Here from that earlier thread you say I’m assbackwards about them not being able to fight prolonged campaigns. In this thread you agree. Which is it?

Sun Feb 15 2015 14:38:52 GMT-0500 (EST) · 64 of 74 ansel12 to DirtyPigpen That’s right Russia was a greater threat, a threat that was defeated, and broken, and now you are supporting them rebuilding by reconquering.

You are basackwards when you say that they have neither the will or the means to take us on long term, that is EXACTLY the opposite of the reality, as we are right this minute discussing their current military operations as part of the process of displaying that will, that goal, and to reestablish those means.


136 posted on 02/15/2015 9:28:11 PM PST by DirtyPigpen (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: DirtyPigpen

Thanks for posting that, you should read it.

You really can’t comprehend the written word.

Read that post again, it doesn’t say they can fight prolonged campaigns, it says they are weaker today and that you want to allow them to rebuild into their past strength.


138 posted on 02/15/2015 9:31:20 PM PST by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson