Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

I pasted your post from the other thread into this one already. Find it yourself.


131 posted on 02/15/2015 9:21:58 PM PST by DirtyPigpen (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: DirtyPigpen

Another lie, you posted an excerpt, I posted the entire thing in post 113.

And there was no contradiction, it described 1980s Russia.

In fact here is the excerpt you posted.

To: ansel12
This is the post where you talk about how powerful they were.

ansel12 to DirtyPigpen Some of us were predicting in 1979 that 1984 was roughly the year or period that Russia needed to move, or else they would lose that window.

That period of 1983 1985 was a very tense time to be a part of those NATO forces, the tension was incredible, and Russia was incredibly powerful at the time, with almost 6 sand a half million men, 7 Airborne Divisions, and masses of Air Assault units and Bridge building and Armor units, a vast military force built entirely on attack, attack, attack.

107 posted on 2/15/2015, 8:43:56 PM by DirtyPigpen


137 posted on 02/15/2015 9:28:12 PM PST by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson