[precisionshootist]

"State-Led Push to Force Constitutional Convention What jackwad wrote the headline ?"

I understand your concern but can we get over this fear of saying "Constitutional Convention" because that's what article V is talking about. A Con Con is for the purpose of creating a new constitution OR MAKING CHANGES TO AN EXISTING ONE.

We will be doing the later but it's still a Constitutional Convention.

If 34 states get together for the sole purpose of passing just one amendment, that's a Constitutional Convention.

If we don't get over this fear of real language it will ultimately be used against us.

[Uri’el-2012]

Please read Article V for correct wording.