Tell it the jury, not me.
12 people in his home state apparently unanimously agreed that he DID violate a law.
And, iF he stopped to reload his weapon before firing an additional, fatal, shot in to a wounded and incapacitated burglar, then I tend to agree with them. Once the threat has been ameliorated, continued self defense becomes assault and then murder.
I’d love to tell it to the jury. It’s not impossible for a jury to be biased.
It was not established that Kaarma “stopped to reload” any more than he supposedly “hunted” Dede (which seems to imply that police “hunting” criminals is a bad thing by extension). The police were summoned and Kaarma’s girlfriend attempted to revive Dede.