From the article linked in #69
The virtues of disclosure are clear. Having your familys name published as a potential hazard to public health would be a strong disincentive to obtaining an exemption for all but the most committed (i.e., delusional) anti-vaxxers. And the rest of us would be able to identify our unvaccinated neighbors, and our childrens unvaccinated schoolmates. This would be especially helpful to pregnant women and the parents and caregivers of children who are either too young to be vaccinated (the first measles mumps rubella vaccine isnt given until after a babys first birthday) or have serious diseases like cancer (as in the case of the Marin County six year old recovering from leukemia) that compromise immune systems and preclude vaccination.
In effect, the question of how to handle unvaccinated children and their parents would move from the realm of school administrators to the community at large. And the community level is where the question is best addressed, since we encounter the unvaccinated not only at school but also in parks, churches, and stores.
There is some risk of community and personal conflict in this shift, to be sure, and anti-harassment laws would have to be strictly enforced. But there would also be potential for the kind of conversations necessary to change minds and get more children vaccinated.
Identify your neighbor Comrade is ANTI-AMERICAN! The idea of “marking” your neighbor who is anti-vaccine would of course require “anti-harassment” laws-we better pay attention to our parental/personal rights when it comes to healthcare with idiots like this one out there who have no regard for individual freedom and liberty.
Thank you, the AMA has been floating the idea for three years that vaccinations be forced. That thought is scary. What next?