Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va; allendale
I am inclined to agree with allendale on this but I think the issue is really only one of a timeline. The aircraft carrier remains the principal platform for the projection of national power but new technology just over the horizon will soon bring the curtain down on a really romantic era.

New wars will be fought with drones, satellites, lasers, computers, submarines and God knows what else. The carrier will remain useful not against major powers but against third world countries much as British gunboats were effective in suppressing the slave trade, piracy or fighting colonial wars. In that role is probable that Nimitz class carriers are too expensive for the job that could be accomplished by smaller cheaper vessels and such a misallocation of funds tends to weaken national security rather than strengthen it. If the new age, and especially in the transition period into the new age it will undoubtedly be necessary to retain some Nimitz class carriers.


33 posted on 02/11/2015 6:14:41 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford

There is a misconception that an aircraft carriers is frail fragile thing. Let me tell you they are not and can take a tremendous beating and stay afloat. It takes a lot, short of a nuclear blast, to actually get one to sink if the water tight doors have been set. They are a honey comb of compartments and passageways....


34 posted on 02/11/2015 6:21:16 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson