Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: arthurus

So the system would still be plagued by tax cheats who hide income.


127 posted on 02/10/2015 10:07:28 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan

Yes, as with any system of taxation at all. However a flat tax set at 9% would have the least of that, far less than the current system. “Paying under the table’ for reason of tax avoidance might not exist at all because the reduction of dollar income that goes with that would simply not be worth it That flat tax should be the entire income tax that goes to the FedGov, including Social Security. Social Security is an income tax and there is no longer even a pretence that it goes into a separate set aside fund. It is general tax revenue and benefits are paid out of generalrevenues.


134 posted on 02/11/2015 6:00:09 AM PST by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson