Posted on 02/09/2015 5:32:33 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
If there was any doubt left, Justice Clarence Thomas ended it on Monday morning.
The United States Supreme Court will end discrimination against same-sex couples this June and even justices who oppose the coming decision appear to know its going to happen.
On Monday morning, Justice Clarence Thomas made explicit what had been growing apparent to observers for months: The court at least a majority of the justices has made up its mind on the issue of whether the U.S. Constitution bars states from treating same-sex couples differently than opposite-sex couples in marriage laws.
In denying the Alabama attorney generals request to keep a U.S. district court order that strikes down Alabamas ban on same-sex couples marriages on hold while the state appeals, the Supreme Court even as it considers marriage cases out of four other states made it clear that the justices will not stop same-sex couples from marrying in the meantime when a judge strikes down a ban.
The cases the Supreme Court has agreed to hear Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee come out of the one federal appeals court that said bans on marriages for same-sex couples are constitutional.
Since October 2014, when the justices decided not to hear cases from five states where the appeals courts had struck down the bans as unconstitutional, the justices have denied requests to keep marriage rulings on hold during appeals.
Court observers, including BuzzFeed News, see these decisions as a signal of the courts direction. But the court had given no reason for denying the stay requests leaving people guessing.
Alabama Attorney General Luther Stranges request, however, was the first stay application to reach the justices since they had agreed to hear the cases out of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. Some including Strange and Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley had hoped the court would treat stay requests differently now that it had taken up the issue.
On Monday morning, though, the court denied the request. Just by itself, the move would have been the strongest statement yet about where the court is headed on the ultimate question.
But Thomas brought the issue out into the open. He issued a statement, in which he was joined by Justice Antonin Scalia, explaining why they would have granted a stay to Alabama the first word from a justice suggesting the expected end result in the matter.
In the short, three-page statement, Thomas criticized the court for look[ing] the other way as yet another Federal District Judge casts aside state laws without making any effort to preserve the status quo pending the Courts resolution of a constitutional question it left open in United States v. Windsor, the 2013 decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Acts ban on federal recognition of same-sex couples marriages.
This acquiescence may well be seen as a signal of the Courts intended resolution of that question, he wrote, referring to the question of whether bans on marriage for same-sex couples are constitutional. This is not the proper way to discharge our Article III responsibilities. And, it is indecorous for this Court to pretend that it is.
The Supreme Court is expected to hear oral arguments in the Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee cases in late April, with a decision expected by late June.
Given Thomas dissent today, the only real question left outstanding is where Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito will end up on the ultimate question. Although both dissented in the Windsor DOMA decision, neither has joined Thomas and Scalia in saying publicly that they would have granted any of the recent stay requests.
No doubt about it, this country is no longer America. Christians will one day have to decide whether to obey God or man.
Me too. A country unworthy of the sacrifice of its heroes is unworthy of being defended.
Revolt is coming.
>>What else is left for the left to fight for?
Total submission by, and annihilation of, anybody who contradicts their state-established perversity.
Just simply do civil disobedence.
are neither gay or marriages.
The leftist president who can place a solid reliable majority of leftists on the Court will be the final elected President and the first total dictator. At that point the Court can begin to formally declare provisions of the Constitution to be unconstitutional or just declare the Constitution to be Superseded and the decision will be loudly protested but accepted as the Law of the Land.
It ain't "marriage", snowflakes.
Biology mattersas new research released this week confirmsand no amount of legislation, litigation, or cheerleading can alter that. Whether the high court will elect to legally sever the rights of children to the security and benefits of their mother's and fathers home is anyones guess.
New Research on Same-Sex Households Reveals Kids Do Best With Mom and Dad
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.